In 2020, as the Meta-owned Insta­gram began to crack down on any explic­it­ly erot­ic art or pho­tog­ra­phy, I began to have an Are­opagíti­ca moment, “Give me the lib­er­ty to know, to utter, and to argue freely accord­ing to con­science, above all liberties.”

The 20th and ear­ly 21st cen­turies saw an expan­sive shift away from the nar­row def­i­n­i­tions of accept­abil­i­ty, allow­ing that obscen­i­ty laws and cen­sor­ship were not in keep­ing with the val­ues of a lib­er­al soci­ety. Despite liv­ing a pro­found­ly vanil­la life myself and being a con­fess­ing chris­t­ian — how­ev­er lat­i­tudi­nous — the pecu­liar puri­tanisms sud­den­ly reemer­gent in our era and the ways that a theo­crat­ic moral­i­ty — absent the actu­al θεός — has leaked into our increas­ing­ly cen­so­ri­ous sec­u­lar dis­course trou­bles me deeply. Enough so that I felt I need­ed to act on my long­stand­ing inter­est in the his­to­ry of human sex­u­al­i­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly its lit­er­ary and artis­tic expressions.

We have 37,000 years of red-blood­ed har­lotry depict­ed in every medi­um by every kind of per­son. It is well past time that it was col­lect­ed, as much as pos­si­ble, into one place — a place that does not pur­pose to be a tawdry spank bank, but rather a tidy, ele­gant, well-designed aca­d­e­m­ic overview of the fact that human beings fuck and are fucked, that we have since time immemo­r­i­al immor­tal­ized our fuck­ing in ink, paint, stone, wood, and every oth­er mate­r­i­al know to man.

What­ev­er puri­ty cults and sex­u­al ethics have come and gone and come again, there have always been a sig­nif­i­cant sub­set of the human race who have dis­re­gard­ed their dic­tates. There is no com­mu­ni­ty on earth that has not at some point fos­tered a trade in porno­graph­ic art and lit­er­a­ture and every tech­no­log­i­cal inno­va­tion has quick­ly become a way to cap­ture and dis­sem­i­nate works of a more than obvi­ous­ly car­nal and promis­cu­ous character.

One may enter­tain a seem­ing­ly end­less array of reac­tions to such mate­ri­als, whether indul­gent or sup­pres­sive, but one can­not with any intel­lec­tu­al hon­esty deny the pro­lif­er­a­tion of sex­u­al­ly explic­it cre­ative work.  There is noth­ing mod­ern about it. It is my aim, there­fore, to cre­ate a sort of data­base of antique, mul­ti­cul­tur­al, glob­al­ly-sourced pornog­ra­phy to set­tle once and for all whether we are jus­ti­fied in address­ing the appetites of a soci­ety and its peo­ple by cen­sor­ship and coer­cion or whether we are, in fact, mere­ly the last in a long line of would-be author­i­tar­i­an moral­ists who believe in depriv­ing peo­ple of knowl­edge, the choice to expe­ri­ence, to see, to utter, to argue freely over this most ele­men­tal facet of human life.

The truth remains, what­ev­er the zeal­ous and unbend­ing ortho­dox­ies of the moment, “I can­not praise a fugi­tive and clois­tered virtue, unex­er­cised and unbreathed, that nev­er sal­lies out and sees her adver­sary, but slinks out of the race where that immor­tal gar­land is to be run for, not with­out dust and heat.” Let the mass of free per­sons judge for them­selves whether they shall be gov­erned by the old­est of pro­fes­sions and its atten­dant devices, rather than pre­tend­ing that “com­mu­ni­ties” main­tain “stan­dards” which there is no evi­dence any but a minor­i­ty hold.

 

Your most pride­ful and dis­obe­di­ent servant,

The Cura­tor